Eco Active Families |

| by Chiwah

Why Families Must Embrace Eco Activism Immediately

Who do we love more than our kids? Who could lay claim to our hearts the way our beloved children do, even as they try our patience?

If your children’s lives were in danger, wouldn’t you leap tall buildings, run into a flaming house, brave drowning or being run over by a car to save them?

I imagine you would. Family is all about love. Love is about caring. And when we care, we take action to protect those we love. We step up and make a difference.

Right now, our world needs us to step up and make a difference. Each and every one of us, in whatever small and not-so-small ways we can imagine. As the news spotlight moves from issue to issue, from bullying to sexism to racism to human trafficking to—you name it, we’re confronted with enough issues to make our heads swim.

The Two Greatest Threats of Our Times, Other than War

Other than the threat of war, the two issues most threatening to our childrens’ lives (and our own) are Climate Change and the ongoing mismanagement of Nuclear Waste. These two mega-issues put us all in greater danger than mankind has ever known, threatening to obliterate most, if not all, life on Earth within a few generations—unless we take active steps to change that.

Climate Change News and Global Warming Facts

There are those who call global warming a hoax, among them some Southern Baptists and the most evangelical Protestant Christian sects. But the scientific evidence is clear. Others say the climate change news is real, a natural cycle, not the result of human activity, but again, the evidence makes a strong statement to the contrary.

Some conservative Christian groups claim environmentalism is the enemy of God. Still others come up with multitudes of explanations for climate change that absolve humanity of responsibility. Yet the scientific evidence against all of them is strong.

Time is short. In September of 2019, UN biodiversity experts issued a strong statement to the effect that nearly a million species risk extinction within decades, “while current efforts to conserve earth’s resources will likely fail without radical action.” Unless we step up and demand real solutions, all the other issues and challenges we face will soon be moot.

The point is not to panic, but rather to come together as a family and take constructive action.

Your kids and mine, not to mention any offspring they may produce, will suffer immensely.

Is there still time to turn things around? The Paris Accord set 2030 as the date by which we must take the necessary steps to guarantee a maximum global temperature increase of 1.5-degree Centigrade. We’re already at one degree. The odds of keeping it to 1.5 degrees are short. Having been put on notice that “current efforts to conserve earth’s resources will likely fail without radical action,” we must increase the effort.

Nuclear Waste Mismanagement

Nuclear waste is grossly mismanaged all across the United States. Unlike most of the other countries of the world, we store nearly all our radioactive waste in cooling pools until it’s cool enough to be moved into stainless steel containers. Those containers are so thin they must be welded shut, thus they cannot be opened, inspected or repaired.

Where do we store those cans? From Maine’s Yankee Nuclear Power Plant to California’s San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, they’re all stored next to a lake, a river, or an ocean beach.

Why? Because the cooling pools (in which the waste was stored before it was transferred into the cans) require a constant source of cold water. And once the waste is transferred into the cans and the cans are welded shut, they can’t be opened for inspection—and, for safety reasons, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requires inspection prior to transporting the cans away from their point of origin. So the cans remain there, close to the water.

What’s wrong with this arrangement? Water is a powerful erosive agent.

Everyone cries out for the waste to be moved away from the water, bemoaning the fact that so far, the federal government has not found a satisfactory location for a central nuclear waste dump. Yucca Mountain in Nevada was supposed to be it, but Nevada’s citizens don’t want it in their backyard.

Yet that is a moot point, since by law the uninspectable canisters cannot be moved to Yucca Mountain or any other such location.

There is a simple solution: Replace those cans with the thick-walled casks used my most other countries, where greed isn’t always the deciding factor.

It’s not a forever solution, but it will buy us time. Holtec International, the company that makes the dry-storage canisters used at nearly all US nuclear waste stations, also makes the much-thicker-walled casks. The only reason we don’t use them, says Charles Langley, Director of PublicWatchdogs.org, is that the utility companies are pleasing their shareholders by buying the cheaper, thin-walled cans.

Follow the money!

It’s Up to Us

If we want the powers that be (the utility companies and/or our federal government) to invest in thick-walled casks, we are going to have to turn up the fire under them.

And once the casks are purchased, it will be up to us to make sure the waste gets transferred into them!

President Trump isn’t going to force the issue for us, nor is he likely to take any positive steps on the climate change front. Just the opposite, in fact. He has rejected the Paris Accord, he’s encouraging fracking and coal mining at all costs, he’s doing everything he can to destroy the solar industry, he’s calling on the Bureau of Land Management to end the moratorium on leasing public lands out for coal mining, and more.

And since corporations are constrained by law(!) to favor their shareholders over the public good, we can’t expect help from them, either.

In the absence of governmental or corporate leadership or even cooperation, and knowing that millions of Americans still consider climate change a hoax, what conclusion is a thinking person to draw?

Only one: that keeping Earth a safe habitat for living things is up to us, those who understand the threat and who care. It’s up to You and Me. And our kids, since they’re the ones who will be most affected.

Can we do it?

To quote Margaret Mead, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”

One thing we know for sure: If we fail to make the effort, our chances of success are Z-e-r–o. Throwing up our hands in despair and anticipation of defeat would be our worst possible choice. If you don’t know where to start, you’ll find lots of ideas here and here.

Why Families? Why Involve Our Kids?

Why turn to the family to make the difference? Because the family is the core of American society, the haven in which values are formed and nurtured.

The American lifestyle is putting our kids’ and our grandkids’ futures at risk. Unless we take visible and effective steps to change that, our kids will soon be blaming us for contributing to the death of their world. And they won’t be wrong.

What they may not want to consider, however, is that they too have enjoyed the fruits of this lifestyle.

To make lasting change, we must involve our children, make them aware that they share in the responsibility, prepare them to be action takers for life. Show them by example, yes, but also by getting them actively involved.

And they will want to be involved. Action is power! And kids love power. So why not raise them to be powerful contributors to a new, sustainable lifestyle? They’ve gotten a taste of it watching Greta Thunberg holding her own at the UN. What a role model for courage!

Now, let’s inspire them not only to speak out and be heard, but to take action to be more climate-conscious in their own lives, to inspire others, and to make it impossible for corporations and governments to continue with business as usual.

Vital Steps Parents Should Consider Taking

That’s why it’s vital that we include them in our activism. We have the opportunity to:

Get informed. Harken to the saying, “Follow the money.” Where there is evil, there is a payoff. We must seek out the real motives behind the messages we’re being fed. To do that, we can support and subscribe to non-advertising-funded news sources, where the news hasn’t been edited to suit the moneymen.
Invite our kids to discuss the scary issues with us. If we take a deep breath and ask them what they know, ask them how they feel about it, we may be amazed!. We can suggest topics for investigation. It won’t work to soft-pedal the issues; kids are good at recognizing blarney. They may know more than we do, so we should be prepared to learn from them, too.
Protect our kids against depression and resentment by empowering them with the only truly viable antidote, other than prayer: Action.
Strengthen our family bonds by working (and praying, if that’s your way) together to raise awareness and demand solutions. In many cases, the solutions are available—the only impediments to implementing them are habit and resistance to change.
Join with other families to have a bigger impact than one family could hope to have.
Give our children a working sense of the importance of teamwork and the results that can be achieved by working together.

Family Activism Can Be Fun!

If we try to impose activism on our children, they will resent it and we will have defeated the goal of preparing them for a lifetime of responsible citizenship. Instead, we can choose projects that let us have fun with our kids! Like:

Making signs together and then carrying them in marches. Guaranteed, the little girl in this picture had a great time making her sign. And she enjoyed the march, too!
Writing activist songs and singing them together in viral videos on the Internet.
Writing Letters to the Editor together—Write individual letters and combine the best parts. Imagine your children’s pride when they see their letters in print!
Attending City Council meetings together and standing up for the issues we’ve agreed in advance are important. This is a wonderful way to teach kids about local civic responsibility. Imagine the wonderful discussions you can have on the way home!
Buying or building bird houses or bird feeders and installing them in your yard. This can be an exciting project, made even more delightful as the birds congregate and entertain you with their antics. Many birds are endangered, and providing them proper food can help to preserve threatened species. Brits have had wonderful successes with this.

Owl box (top), wire mesh box of dryer lint for nest building (lower left) and small birdhouse with liftable wall for easy cleaning, all made by Ray Collier of Vista, CA, 760-505-0281, email visnav@sbcglobal.net.

Creating online audio or video podcasts or a blog together to show people what they can do about rainforest destruction. Educational family projects like this can have a big impact on readers and viewers as they help save valuable rainforests.
Setting your kids to work on the Internet researching plant-based alternatives to plastic wrap and paper towels. Then buy and try. Many are excellent!

These are just of few of the many available options for getting your family involved in making a meaningful difference in the climate change crisis.

It is our duty as loving parents to make sure we don’t pass the illness that has led us into this deplorable situation on to our children! Join us in taking action today, as families who care about our children’s and grandchildren’s future.

To your success with family activism,
Chiwah Slater
Founder, ecoactive101.com
Founder, https://AWriteToKnow.com
Founder, https://PetWrites.com

Nuclear Waste |

September 27, 2019

| by Chiwah

Speaking Out Could Win Nuclear Waste Lawsuit

What do you do when a newspaper runs a front-page article featuring the comments of big business and regulatory entities that contradict or denigrate what you know to be true? And when the article’s subhead takes the opposition’s stand?

You write a Letter to the Editor!

So that’s what I did when three days ago the Orange County Register ran such an article.

The Newspaper Article—Fair Or Not?
That article concerned a court filing by Southern California Edison, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the manufacturer of the nuclear waste canisters now being used at nuclear plants all over the country. They are urging the court to reject a suit seeking to halt nuclear fuel transfers at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

The suit was filed by Public Watchdogs, a San Diego-based nonprofit organization.

“They ask the judge,” the article reported, “to toss the suit for — among other things — being filed in the wrong court four years too late, and for peddling fear rather than facts.”

I don’t know about the choice of court or the timing, but I do know that Public Watchdogs has the facts in their corner—I should say “in our corner,” since it’s our safety Public Watchdogs is watching out for.

The Suit Itself
The most basic fact behind the suit is that the storage containers Edison is loading with high-burnup radioactive fuel are unsafe, due at least in part to a manufacturing flaw that causes every one of them to be gouged as they are lowered into the ground.

Edison has already loaded 33 canisters and lowered them into the ground, inadvertently gouging every one of them from top to bottom, thus setting the scene for cracks to develop.

The Newspaper’s Update
In a move toward journalistic objectiity, the Register updated its article the following day, adding this: “In a response emailed after this story posted, Public Watchdogs’ attorney Chuck La Bella took on Edison and the NRC point-by-point.” And then they listed Bella’s points.

Since the print version of the article was already on the newsstands, La Bella’s response only made it into the online version. So readers of the printed paper won’t be informed of the mere 25-year “warranty” on the cans or the fact that the silos into which they are lowered are “guaranteed to perform their function for a mere 10 years.”

Nor will they read that the “60-year design life” of the cans “does not take into consideration any of the scratches, gouges, or other defects that these canisters have,” or that “there is no viable plan to ever move the buried fuel because – as everyone from the US Congress to the NRC has admitted – there is no storage facility were the waste can be moved. Thus, the undeniable fact is this fuel will be buried right where is it for years to come.”

Still, the Register has a lot of online readers who will have a chance to see the facts that only got reported because La Bella responded with a Letter to the Editor.

Why Trouble Yourself to Speak Out?
The public speaking out is the only reason this case has made it to the hearing stage. The court refused to hear a previous suit on this matter; Public Watchdogs CEO Charles Langley told me that the judge said this is the only reason she agreed to hear this case.

I don’t know yet whether my letter got published or not. If it did, it will inform readers of additional facts supporting Public Watchdogs’ suit.

The court may rule in our favor, or it may rule for Edison and the NRC. If the latter, the battle for a safer San Onofre will continue. It has to—so much is at stake here.

The point is—It is so important that we all take the time to speak out for what’s right. You never know—your Letter to the Editor might be the one that makes the difference.

To your eco-active success,
Chiwah Slater
Founder, ecoactive101.com
Founder, https://AWriteToKnow.com
Founder, https://PetWrites.com

Nuclear Waste |

September 21, 2019

| by Chiwah

Nuclear Waste—How to Be Part of the Solution

You love your family. You’d do just about anything to make sure their lives are not at risk. Right? But … do you have any idea of the risk they’re exposed to by America’s improper and irresponsible nuclear waste storage? Most people do not.

Oh, they may know the government hasn’t yet found an acceptable central storage site. But they’ve read that it’s on the verge of finding one, and then everything will be A-OK.

When I explain that that is nowhere near true, I often see a shield come down over their faces. They do not want to hear any more.

I get it, really I do: radioactive waste—what we used to call “atomic” waste—is scary.

But the problems with nuclear waste storage are real, and they pose serious dangers all over this country. Even in states where there are no nuclear reactors! How can that be? Leaking nuclear waste is blown by the winds, and winds are no resppectors of state lines.

In this article I expose some of the hard-to-face facts about the deplorable status of our collective nuclear waste and suggest steps you can take to change things.

The Facts
FACT: Although people are clamoring to move this highly radioactive waste away from those beaches, lakes and rivers, the thin-walled cans in which the radioactive waste is stored cannot legally or safely be moved—even if we manage to agree on a place to move them to. Why? Because they cannot be inspected for internal microscopic cracks that could lead to radiation leaks. The NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) senior inspector has said it is impossible for these canisters to be inspected according to ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) required code.

FACT: The utility companies that manage our radioactive waste keep telling us it’s safe, nothing to worry about.

FACT: Systems analysts and geologists tell us it is NOT safe, that the radioactive waste needs to be transferred into thick casks so that it can be legally and safely moved away from the beaches, lakes and rivers. And even if the utility companies had a way to inspect their thin-wall cans for cracks, they have no viable plans in place for replacing cracking leaking canisters.

CASE IN POINT: After a hiatus that occurred in response to a whistleblower’s revelation last August of a near-miss 18-foot canister fall at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, just south of San Clemente, California, Edison has resumed loading of spent (but still highly radioactive and very hot) fuel rods into the thin-wall canisters.

FACT: The NRC agrees that EVERY can of nuclear waste stored at San Onofre has been damaged by gouging due to a design flaw. As Donna Gilmore, the systems analyst who runs the highly informative website SanOnofreSafety.org, reently pointed out to me, a “gouge” is the beginning of a crack—a wide crack. (The NRC has repeatedly weakened their safety requirements to accommodate shortcomings in the storage and handling of nuclear waste.)

And San Onofre is storing these canisters in a trench 100 feet from a rising ocean and very near a major earthquake fault.

FACT: The NRC recently refused to cite the can manufacturer for their defective design that puts San Onofre out of compliance with their NRC license. And Edison has not indicated any intention of switching to thick-wall casks for safer waste storage. In fact, transfer of waste from the thin-wall cans to thick-wall casks would require a “hot cell,” which Edison has no plans to build.

WARNING: Don’t dismiss this as a southern California problem. The nuclear waste in plants all over the country is stored in similar thin-wall containers, set close to beaches where water levels are likely to rise as climate change progresses. And as cans begin to crack, they become susceptible to water-induced corrosion.

FACT: There are thick-wall casks available that can be legally and safely moved away from the water. So there is a solution—not a forever solution, but one that would buy us the years we so desperately need to seek a more permanent solution.

FACT: Holtec International, manufacturer of the cans in question, has recently gone from being just a container builder and supplier to purchasing decommissioned nuclear plants all around the world. Holtec just purchased the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant in Massachusetts.

As one local activist wrote in an email, “[Holtec] will now own and operate the decommissioned Pilgrim NPP, pocket all the public trust funds and provide what? The same kind of shoddy service they are famous for?”

There’s a lot of money in the public trust funds for the company that handles the decommissioning … hmm, I just learned that “Krishna P. Singh, the founder, president and CEO of energy technology firm Holtec International, and wife Martha J. Singh bought a waterfront mansion in Jupiter for $10.5 million.”

FACT: Though SONGS is situated on federal property, Edison is responsible for protecting the public safety until they manage to turn the facility over to another responsible party, presumably the DOE. Or …

QUESTION: What other plants will Holtec be acquiring? The thought that this provider of inadequate storage canisters might be put in control of San Onofre and decisions determining the continued habitability of the southern third of our country (since wind carries our air south and east across the country) is upsetting, to say the least. Yet it could happen—with several billions in public trust funds ending up in Holtec’s pockets.

FACT: As of August 30, 2019, “Public Watchdogs, a nonprofit advocacy group, has requested an immediate court-ordered halt to the transfer of deadly radioactive nuclear waste at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) into “thin-walled” dry storage canisters. In the temporary restraining order (TRO) filed with the United States District Court, Public Watchdogs is petitioning the courts to step in and protect the environment and the lives of more than 8 million people who live within the radiation plume zone identified by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).”

Will their suit succeed? Let’s hope so. If not, they’ll file another one. But filing suits is expensive, so they’ll need all the help we can give. Charles Langley, Public Watchdogs CEO and Executive Director, says (personal communication) that public outcry is the only reason the court has agreed to hear their case. (OUR case.)

FACT: Speaking up makes a difference!

What Can You Do?
You can and should speak up at every opportunity.

If you live in California or anywhere in the wind path, write to California Governor Gavin Newsom and ask that he protect you and your community by calling a halt to the release of ratepayer funds to Edison until they agree to store all SONGS radioactive nuclear waste in thick-wall casks that have ASME N3 nuclear pressure vessel certificates.
Write letters to the editor of your local paper.
Attend community and local government meetings and take a stand.
Call your elected federal, state and local officials and demand they require replacement of the thin-wall cans being used at our nuclear plants with safer, thick-wall cans.

In short, do the annoying things you’d rather ignore as you go about your daily routine. We cannot afford to leave this to chance.

FACT: By failing to assert yourself publicly on this issue, you make yourself part of the problem.

CONCLUSION: Be part of the solution. If you live near or in the wind path of a nuclear plant, even if it’s closed down, you have a serious nuclear waste safety problem. Seek out opportunities to publicly demand replacing thin-walled canisters with thick-walled casks.

Once that’s done, we can afford to focus on the next step: finding a permanent storage location for the radioactive nuclear waste.

For a more in-depth analysis of what is happeing across the country with nuclear waste, see https://columbusfreepress.com/article/dark-dawning-age-nuclear-waste-begins.

To your eco-active success,
Chiwah Slater
Founder, ecoactive101.com
Founder, https://AWriteToKnow.com
Founder, https://PetWrites.com